"What difference does it make?"

Madame Clinton has stated clearly that the lies and diversions that the Obama administration forwarded in the days after the Benghazi attack and brutal murders of our Libyan Ambassador and three other Americans is of no concern. In her own words; "What difference, at this point does it make?" My, oh my! This is quite the statement from one, who as a Senator was constantly harassing the former administration. This was her right as a member of the United States Congress constitutionally given oversight of the very Executive branch that she now finds herself an employee of. But, my how the times have changed. 

You know, it's much easier to throw stones than it is to dodge them, but that's beside the point. Our current president, who was also a Senator during Madam Clinton's tenure and also ardently opposed the former administration,  promised transparency to the American people when he ran for office. I don't know why anyone would believe a promise of transparency by someone who spent millions of dollars concealing much of his past, but that's another story that has been covered by many and ignored by the Main Stream Media. However, I want to focus on the here and now and in particular on what Madam Clinton believes doesn't matter, then I'll use her very argument to illustrate the sheer hypocrisy of many liberal/progressive/socialist claims. 

~~~~~~~~~~

What difference does it make? Madam Clinton I believe that lying to anyone is wrong and I particularly think that a government, whose main function is to represent the people that allow themselves to be governed, would lie to them is abhorrent. Susan Rice went on, not one, not two, but three Sunday morning shows and stated that the attack was in response "to a video". You yourself mentioned on several occasions that it was due to a video and your boss, the President of the United States made the very same statement. It was a lie Madam Clinton; a lie designed to deflect and cover for something.

"Bush Lied People Died!"  Madam Clinton, you and those who you align yourself with politically used this very line for years. It was mere political speech because there were WMDs in Iraq. Hussein gassed the Kurds in the late 80s; it's documented fact and he had plenty of gas stored for the future. Tons of "yellowcake" were taken from Iraq after the fall of the government. But, even if  it's true that "Bush Lied People Died!" 

Madam Clinton, "What difference does it make?

~~~~~~~~~~~

There are four dead Americans and one of them was our official representative in that country. Not only were they killed, but our ambassador was brutalized and raped before he died. The other three died protecting the ambassador and defending the consulate. The Ambassador had sent cable after cable to the State Department begging for more security at the consulate; he never got it. When the consulate asked for backup when the assault began.... they never got it. By the way Madam Clinton, who gave the order to stand down? Why wasn't, at the very least, an F16 or C130 Gunship flying low within minutes of the attack?

~Tin soldiers and Nixon coming,

We're finally on our own.

This summer I hear the drumming,

Four dead in Ohio.

Gotta get down to it

Soldiers are gunning us down

Should have been done long ago.

What if you knew her

And found her dead on the ground

How can you run when you know?~

Madam Clinton, "What difference does it make?"

~~~~~~~~~~~

The filmmaker, that made the so called "inflammatory video", a naturalized American citizen has been harassed by the federal government since this incident. His arrest was televised. The last I heard he is still in prison for "parole violations". I wonder if he would have been put in jail for these parole violations had he not made this video? Somehow I think not. That's a very good use of federal power; harassing citizens for exercising their 1st Amendment rights. The administration should be proud. that they are following in the footsteps of the former administration.

~After being targeted by the federal government for years of scrutinizing former President George W. Bush’s handling of foreign affairs in Iraq and Afghanistan, Juan Cole — professor of Middle Eastern and South Asian history — instigated a formal investigation of the administration claiming it unlawfully sought personal information about him.

University officials and professors said that his blog, the Informed Comment, is protected under the first amendment right to free speech, and that the U.S. government is violating his constitutional rights by embarking upon a personal investigation of Cole for the blog entries he wrote regarding the war.~

Madam Clinton, "What difference does it make?"

~~~~~~~~~~~~

It's fact that the administration lied to the American people. The UN Ambassador did, you did, several others within the administration did and the President did as well. Governments that lie really shouldn't be trusted by the people who they represent because a lie is nothing more than a cover; it is used to conceal something, otherwise there would be no reason to lie. You are hiding something Madam Clinton. We don't know what it is, but we know that the administration is hiding something from the American people. I wonder, "What did the president know and when did he know it?"

I know that sounds familiar. You probably remember those words quite well. You were politically active in the early 70s when the Watergate hearings were happening and you were probably one of those wanting to see the destruction of President Nixon. It's amazing how a little burglary and political hi jinx can get out of hand, but Nixon was a fool to think that he could get away with a cover up. After all, that was the big deal, wasn't it? Had he come clean at the beginning and turned in the culprits it might of gone on a little further, but I don't think a Senate investigation, calls for impeachment and his ultimate resignation would have been in order. I was 12 years old during the Watergate hearings and they were televised. I would come home from school and watch them because I was fascinated with the idea that high officials in our government would lie to us. "What did the president know and when did he know it?"

Madam Clinton, "What difference does it make?"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~

Madam Clinton, I agree with Rand Paul. When he said that you should have been relieved of your post for the failures under your watch, he was dead on. You are either incompetent or a liar and America deserves better. It doesn't appear that we're going to get anything much better in the near future, but we'll have to deal with what comes our way as Americans have done for over 200 years now. I hope you run for president in 2016, because I believe that after your defeat America will never have to put up with you again. As a man of faith I recognize that the wicked prosper, for a time and then their time is no more. There is a special place reserved for liars, schemers and corrupt people like you. I'll just have to be content with that knowledge for the time being.

Greg

The "Progressive" Dream Is At Hand

Well, the contentious and hard fought election of 2012 is now behind us and the American people have spoken; Barack Hussein Obama and his party have retained enough power to stymie any attempts to push back on their progressive agenda of "Fundamental Transformation".

It's taken 100 years, but the "Progressive" vision of America is soon to be realized. "Fellow Travelers" of the past from Woodrow Wilson to Hubert Humphrey are rejoicing wherever their souls reside because the great bureaucracy will soon be in place to run our day to day lives. After all, we mere common folk just aren't capable of such a task.

America, the "Land of the Free" and the "Land of Opportunity" will become no longer the home of the "American Dream", but rather will be the home of, in Mr. Obama's words; "The American Promise".

What will this "Fundamental Transformation" look like? Well, all one has to do is look at other places around the globe where similar, if not identical visions have become a reality. More debt, taxes, regulation, governmental intrusion, more subsidies to politically connected industries and voting blocs, more bailouts for failed "too big to fail" companies, cronyism, high energy bills, despair, high unemployment, welfare, food stamps and more societal breakdown.

There will be less things too. Less opportunity, self sufficiency, economic growth, compassion, charity, choices, money for local governments and schools, less, individualism, motivation, success, self accomplishment, self worth and the most important of all less freedom.

America has spoken and for the first time in our history America has said that freedom is just too hard and we would rather have someone else take care of us than do it ourselves. I can only imagine what is going through the minds of the great patriots of the past. God help our republic.

Greg
11/7/12

An Ideology of Failure

Those "vast euphoric crowds" from 2008 have disappeared and Mr. Obama has been exposed as the true radical that he is.  It's going to be a long night for many tomorrow.

It may have taken 4 years for many to understand that Mr. Obama is not what he was marketed to be and that his agenda is not an American agenda, but they understand now. Our federal government was never intended to be a top down authoritative government choosing winners and losers.  The founders understood that society naturally does this and people are only limited by their abilities and efforts.

Mr. Obama's agenda is an agenda that will destroy individual initiative and desire to succeed; punishing those who succeed and rewarding those who don't or won’t.  This is not the natural order of things and all those policies do is put power in the hands of government while taking away the power of the individual.  If after all this time many people don't understand that, then there's really no hope for them to ever understand that.

While it's possible that the government can do good; government cannot do for the individual what the individual can and should do for himself or herself.  It's just not possible. The 13 richest counties in this country are all now in the DC area. That says to me that those counties are rich because they have taken away from my community where the money can be spent much wiser and at lower cost. Every federal dollar taken away from my community is money that can really effect where I live; businesses, churches and yes my local schools.

Mr. Obama’s agenda is one that will eventually starve my community of its resources while feeding an already bloated and inefficient federal bureaucracy always hungry for more and never satisfied.

Mr. Obama's ideology is not a new one and has been around for a very long time.   His agenda is steeped in failed ideas that never work and never will work because they are ignorant of human nature.  You can't force people to be good or compassionate and you can't force people to share, because when you do coerce that kind of behavior, it is no longer goodness, compassion or caring.  For the life of me I can't understand why so many people can't wrap their minds around that very fact.  Government spending on social programs is not charity, and though I believe there is a need for a safety net for those who truly cannot take care of themselves, I cannot agree with a system that creates dependency and you cannot deny that the system does.  A government handout may take care of one’s current physical needs, but at what cost?  A government handout cannot give you a sense of accomplishment and it can't give you a sense of self worth.

But if altruism is what many believe Mr. Obama’s agenda to be about, They are lying to themselves and have failed to see the reality.  His agenda is designed to create dependency, despair and dehumanization where people look only to the government for help and therefore will continue to vote for him and others who believe as he does.  In essence, his agenda is an agenda designed to perpetuate power in the hands of a small elite in a far off capitol. Anyone with their eyes fully open understands this.

Greg
November 5, 2012

Recently finished reading a biography of Ray Bradbury. Ray was quite the prolific writer and he attributed this to the fact that he wrote every day. Writing, like many artistic endeavors requires inspiration, but it is also an acquired skill. I'm jealous of those who can just sit down and write a story, or can simply document their day; it's never come that easy for me.

I enjoy writing and I enjoy the process, but it also causes much frustration for me. Education is not what I have a lot of and English wasn't one of my better subjects when I did attend school. As I look back on this it makes me wonder because I've always enjoyed being creative. It could be that I have high standards in this area and a lot of what comes from my word processor isn't that good and I know it, but maybe that's not the point. Maybe, I'm to just write regardless of those standards so that the skills needed to write well will be acquired in time.

So, this is my plan; I will be writing every day. I will either write here, or on another blog depending on the subject matter. So here's to writing and hears to reading.

Herman Cain Runaway Slave

     This will be a short post.  There's really not a lot of time right now to dive into this, but the video itself is more than sufficient to get the point across.  Let me just say this; the American left is harsher on conservative women and conservative minorities than they are on anyone else.  You see, the "Democratic" Party doesn't care about blacks, Hispanics, Asians and it doesn't about women; they only care about power, plain and simple.  If a conservative black man or woman wins the Republican nomination, well it just throws a lot of their arguments and suppositions that they've been spewing for decades.

     Enjoy the video and  watch how a white guy tries to tell a black man that he's not black enough.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mqKekzazZIs

     You know, if Herman Cain wins the nomination, we'll finally get a chance to vote for a black man.

A Letter To My Brother/s

Maksim People's Cube

     I recently got into a heated debate on a thread of comments to something my brother posted on facebook.  I should have known better, but I tried.  needless to say, some people got really upset with me, but that's what happens when you bring reason and facts into a room full of liberal Democrats.  When it was all finished I posted a letter to my brother on the thread that I would like to share.  I've cleaned up the grammar a bit because it was written around five o clock in the morning.


     Brother, I've witnessed liberal hypocrisy in action for many years. I'll never forget a union meeting I attended years ago.  One of my "brothers" got up and went on a 20 minute tirade about the special interests.  This corporation here that industry there.  On and on he went about "all this money" going to "buy politicians" and why it should be stopped.  When I asked him later if he was suggesting that we give up our PAC fund he said; "Waddya mean?"  That was one of those rare moments when I was speechless.

     After years of observation I've come to the conclusion that being a liberal Democrat is the easiest thing to be, because you don't have to think; you just have to feel and since your basing your judgments and opinions on feelings and emotions your intentions are "pure" and therefore those who oppose your view are evil.

     All I've done here, and it was quite educational and illustrative was was to point out where Mr. Obama is inconsistent, wrong and why I believe that his policies are bad for the Republic.  Granted, I was a bit snarky and downright confrontational at times, but hey, if the left can do it so can I.  You see they don't like it when their tactics are used against them.

     No one, with the exception of A***r attempted to refute my claims about Mr. Obama.  They resorted to name calling and blaming others.  A***r did get her racist dig at the end of her post, but at least she attempted to counter my points.  Leftists are like insecure children in their world view and any opposition is taken as a personal attack.

     Over the past 2 1/2 years I've witnessed good, honest, decent, lovers of their country be vilified by the those on the left.  The left was even willing to use the attempted assassination of a Congresswoman by a lunatic to try and label their political opponents as "uncivil", "evil" and "hate mongers".  You see, it's an old tactic on the left to render any political opposition impotent by claims that they are "evil".  I don't watch FOX News, but FOX must be doing something right to be hated so much by the left.  Both D***d and E****e suggested that I was a FOX News watcher and that in itself is illustrative of this point; In their childish minds, FOX News is evil, so even facts and good information gleaned from FOX are bad.

      But the one thing that the left really excels at is "projection".  They are the best at projecting their thoughts and emotions on to their political opponents.  This may explain why Mr. Obama loves that teleprompter, after all it is also a kind of projector.  Chances are, if a lefty calls you a racist, they actually are the racist.  If they call you a homophobe, they probably hold those very thoughts. They will always accuse their opposition with the thoughts and feelings that they themselves harbor.  Want to know what a lefty is thinking?  Wait till he calls you a name. 

     Don't apologize, because I won't. Think of this as an exercise and an educational experience.  You see, once you start to understand your enemy, you can combat them.  A liberal Democrat is like a jealous, insecure and scared little child that wants other people's stuff and someone else to take care of them.  I refuse to be silent any longer. If that pisses people off, oh well they better get used to it; this Republic is too dear to allow the world view of idiots to destroy it.


Greg M.

Ahhh, Civilty Reigns!

    Things haven't been going very well for our friends on the left as of late.  Since last November it's been defeat, after defeat and quite frankly their future doesn't look too bright. Thank God that they are the civil ones...... Hahahahahahahaha!

    It's been some time since I've written but the bug has hit me tonight, so please humor me for a few moments while I take a trip down memory lane and then take a current snapshot to paint a picture of leftist hypocrisy.

    In the wake of the Gabrielle Giffords shooting several months ago, Mr. Obama went to Tucson Arizona and gave a very moving speech in which he called for civility in our nation's political discourse.  It was an excellent bit of oratory and well received by everyone.  It was also fascinating  in the sense that, for a week prior, Republicans were blamed by those on the left for the shootings even though it was clear from the beginning that the gunman was.... well..... out of his freaking mind.   Anyway, the message from Mr. Obama's speech was that we should all learn how to get along and play nicely, but of course in "Democrat" speak that means for the opposition to shut up and allow the leftists to have their way.  It's the same thing when they talk of "bipartisanship", but I digress.    The media, of course, went nuts with Barry's speech.  The "great orator was back" and this was the very thing that the "nation needed for healing".  Civility would once again rule our political discourse.  Barry was guaranteed re election.  I don't even want to think of what went on in Chris Matthew's pants. 

    Of course the civil discourse lasted maybe a day and it was the "Democrats" who got the ball rolling, but hey it's only hateful when Republicans do it, right?  Now for that current snapshot.  Let's take a brief look at some of the recent "civility" from our leftist friends, shall we?

    First up, Steve Sweeney.  New Jersey Senate President, fat cat in the state AFL/CIO, former Gloucester County Freeholder, former United Iron Workers business Rep, all around thug and corrupt party boss. (as you can see I'm very proud that he "represents" me in the NJ State Senate)

    Our governor Mr. Christie, has used his veto pen quite effectively and the residents of The Garden State are finally getting some long, long overdue reform and relief.  You see, the unions, in particular public employee unions, have had their way in this state for a very very long time and they've never seen an animal like Chris Christie before.  They're used to flexing their muscle and watching the opposition quiver and hide.  Well, "Mr." Sweeney had to cut a deal, but the deal isn't making his "people" happy, so he went on the radio and had some very nice things to say about governor Christie  .  Note to "Mr." Sweeney; I'm not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination and I voted for the Governor and will again. 

    Next up, Graeme Zielinski. Communications Director Wisconsin State Democratic Party and former reporter for the Washington Post.

    Mr. Zielinski is so compassionate and civil he tweeted his fellow Democrats to celebrate the 45th anniversary of Medicare by punching a Republican.  Now that's civility! I guess we can't blame him, just like New Jersey, Wisconsin used to be a "Blue" state, but sadly for him and his comrades, things just aren't going their way and Wisconsin turned "Red" overnight.  It's been a series of brutal defeats for Wisconsin leftists since last November.  I guess he's upset because the state of Wiscionsin will no longer be a union dues collection agency and the public employee unions will have to collect the dues of state employees and teachers.  That's probably going to throw a monkey wrench into that "Democratic" Party/Public Employee Union money laundering scheme they've had going for decades.

    Finally, I'm going to end with where we began, That's right; Barack Hussein Obama.  Mr. Obama has been showing his proclivity for civility for quite some time now.  Sheesh, I think it only took a week after his Tucson speech before he was out demonizing, ridiculing and dehumanizing his opposition.  This guy is a pro at the "Democratic" brand of civility.   

    A week ago Mr. Obama gave a press conference like non I have ever seen or heard before from a President of The United States.  The tone toward his opposition was condescending, uncivil and mean spirited.  It was not the tone we heard from Mr. Obama that night in Tucson, it was the tone of a man steeped in class warfare and Alinsky tactics.  He even ridiculed his opposition by comparing them to his children and the work of Congress to his children's homework.  I have a feeling that what we witnessed is the real Barack Obama and what we saw that night in Tucson was only an image; the very same image that we saw in 2008. 

    Election season is about to get in to full gear and it doesn't look too good for our friends on the left. They've created a trail of ruin and wasted opportunities.  Mr. Obama now has a record to run on and it's not a very good one.  Americans don't feel confident right now. They are also alarmed at the debt that has been piled onto their children and the "recovery" from the lingering recession is on their minds.   All the signs look like a major defeat for Mr. Obama and his party.  That can be a very scary proposition because anger and violence have always been part of the underpinning of the left; just take a look at Greece.  The vast majority of acts of political violence have been perpetrated by the left. Let's pray it doesn't come to that.

Greg M.

    (After writing and posting this article, some more examples of leftwing incivility. Thought I would post them here and keep a running list.)
    Newsweek Boss Tina Brown Says GOP Are 'Suicide Bombers' on MSNBC's Morning Joe.  Wow! Now that's "civil".
    Old Tingles himself, Chris Matthews twice in less than 24 hours compares Republicans to 'Terrorists'.
      Bill Maher in an all too common attack on Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman. I think he wrote the book on leftist civility.